Mitchell v. Curran
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Bluementhal v. Toriue, 40 Mo. 159 ; Fraugmans v. Hersey, 43 Mo. 122 ; Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289 ; Price v. Evans, 43 Mo. ■397 ; Allen’s Admr. v. Richmond, Col., 41 Mo. 307 ; Penn v. Lewis, 12 Mo. 161, 162 ; McKeon v. Citizens’ R. R. Co., •42 Mo. 84; Schmeidling v.Ewing, 57 Mo. 78, 83 ; Doering v. Saum, 56 Mo. 479 ; Wag.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Bluementhal v. Toriue, 40 Mo. 159 ; Fraugmans v. Hersey, 43 Mo. 122 ; Easley v. Elliott, 43 Mo. 289 ; Price v. Evans, 43 Mo. ■397 ; Allen’s Admr. v. Richmond, Col., 41 Mo. 307 ; Penn v. Lewis, 12 Mo. 161, 162 ; McKeon v. Citizens’ R. R. Co., •42 Mo. 84; Schmeidling v.Ewing, 57 Mo. 78, 83 ; Doering v. Saum, 56 Mo. 479 ; Wag. Stat., ch. 8, sec. 23; Hyeronimus v. Allison, 52 Mo. 102 ; Squires v. Anderson, 54 Mo. 197; Tucker v. Allen, 47 Mo. 490; Shores v. Bowen, 44 Mo. 397; Morse on Arb. 115, 116, 126; Field v. Oliver, 43 Mo. 200 ; Shelbina Hotel Assn.…
1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.
This is a motion for a rehearing. It is accompanied with reasons, and counsel for respondents have filed, to support, these reasons, a somewhat elaborate brief.
The point decided by this court was, that an award of arbitrators will not be set aside because it is against the evidence, and that it was not error in the Circuit Court to-refuse to look into the question as to whether dr not there was any evidence to support the award.
In the opinion filed in the cause, some leading English cases, and also decisions of the Supreme Court of this State, *459were cited to show that the English rule has been…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Benoist v. MurrinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Field v. OliverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Tucker v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
- Bridgman v. BridgmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
- Shores v. BowenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.