Legal Opinion

Smith v. Gratz

New York Marine Court

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for judgment on answer as frivolous.

1Opinion of the Court

Hawes, J. —

The motion is for judgment on the answer as frivolous. The answer denies having any knowledge or *275information sufficient to form a belief as to any or all the allegations in the complaint contained and, therefore, denies the same, except as hereinafter specifically admitted. The facts which were specifically admitted having been demurred to the plaintiff moves'for judgment on this general denial, relying upon the case of McEnroe agt. Decker (58 How., 250). The form of pleading here used is one well known to the profession and has been sanctioned for years. That it is evasive must be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The People v. . Northern Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Brown Bros. Electrical Contractors, Inc. v. Beam Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. DillonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API