Legal Opinion

Evans v. Lawyer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1930No. 22431PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The question as to whether or not there was a new contract between Lawyer and Evans with regard to the papering is a question of fact which both courts below passed upon adversely to plaintiffs in error; and, as this court does not review questions of fact, but only examines the evidence for the purpose of seeing whether there is any evidence in the case to support the judgment in question, we will not disturb the findings of the courts below upon that ground.

As to the claimed estoppel, the opinion of the Court of Appeals contains the following:

“Second. Was the plaintiff barred by reason of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carr v. HooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  2. Becker v. HopperWyoming Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rorick v. Devon Syndicate, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Boyd v. Royal Indemnity Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Sun Bldg. Ltd. Partnership v. Value Learning & Teaching Academy, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. Dabney, Admr. v. Rose Brothers Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. A 1 a Plumbing, Heating & Maintenance, Inc. v. YoakemOhio Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API