Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1929No. 20045Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

We will amplify the first headnote only. The first special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges that the court erred in refusing to allow a witness (Martin) to testify under the following circumstances: After the witnesses were sworn the solicitor-general requested that they be sequestered. This was done. After the witnesses for the State and some of those for the defendant had testified, the attorney for the defendant discoverd that Martin was in the court-room and had not been sworn, and stated to the court that Martin’s name had not been given to him with the other witnesses for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Wise v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API