Rogers v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Dissent · BakerKaren R. Baker, Justice
Because Rogers was prejudiced by the circuit court's erroneous ruling in refusing to allow Rogers to impeach LW with her prior theft conviction, I dissent from the majority opinion and would reverse and remand the matter for a new trial. Here, the majority holds that the circuit court's ruling was harmless because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming:
[T]he circuit court's error fits the harmless-error mold.... Here, the evidence that Rogers raped LW is overwhelming. LW testified in specific detail to multiple occurrences of rape. TB testified that she observed a video of Rogers engaged in…
Also in this document: Dissent · Hart.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Winfrey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.