Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 12, 2018No. CR-17-916Published

1Dissent · BakerKaren R. Baker, Justice

Because Rogers was prejudiced by the circuit court's erroneous ruling in refusing to allow Rogers to impeach LW with her prior theft conviction, I dissent from the majority opinion and would reverse and remand the matter for a new trial. Here, the majority holds that the circuit court's ruling was harmless because the evidence of guilt was overwhelming:

[T]he circuit court's error fits the harmless-error mold.... Here, the evidence that Rogers raped LW is overwhelming. LW testified in specific detail to multiple occurrences of rape. TB testified that she observed a video of Rogers engaged in…

Also in this document: Dissent · Hart.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Winfrey v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API