Legal Opinion
Goulet v. New Penn Motor Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 8, 2008No. 06-2487PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant-plaintiff Craig Goulet appeals from the entry of a directed verdict in favor of defendant New Penn Motor Express (“New Penn”) and from a jury verdict in favor of defendant Teamsters Local 25 (“Local 25” or “the union”) in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on his hybrid claim for breach of a labor agreement by New Penn and breach of the duty of fair representation by the union, in violation of 29 U.S.C. § 185. We affirm the judgments in favor of the defendants.
Facts
APA Transport Company (“APA”) was a trucking corporation…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Waste Management Holdings, Inc. v. MowbrayCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jennings v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Cion Peralta v. T. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Estate of Berganzo-Colón Ex Rel. Berganzo v. AmbushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Lindsay Int'l Sales & Serv., LLC v. WegenerNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.