Patti Lemmon v. Richard Ayres
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
Plaintiff-Appellant Patti Lemmon appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment. The parties have waived oral argument, and we unanimously agree that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). On appeal, Lemmon argues that she stated valid claims for (1) unjust enrichment; (2) promissory estoppel; (3) overtime under the Federal Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”); and (4) FLSA-relat-ed state law claims. Because we conclude that Lemmon has established genuine issues of material fact, we REVERSE and REMAND for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
I
Lemmon worked for defendant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. Muskegon CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
- John Orton v. Johnny's Lunch Franchise, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.