Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Fisher v. Pittsburgh Public Parking Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1969No. Appeal, No. 149Published

1Concurrence

Concurring Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts:

I agree with the result reached by the majority, but I find it unnecessary to decide whether under the Eminent Domain Code a tenant may recover dislocation damages if he is forced to move after the technical expiration date of his lease. I believe that since this entire transaction was achieved through private negotiation and sale, no question is presented under the Eminent Domain Code. Recovery under the Eminent Domain Code, by a tenant or otherwise, in my view is possible only after an eminent domain proceeding has been brought and where someone is a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shippingport Ferry Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API