Legal Opinion

Bacchus v. Peters

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from- Chancery Court of Shelby County. W. ~W. McDowell, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtSnodgrass, J.

The amended bill in this cause alleged the death of Thos. Peters, a non-resident; that he left property in this State, and sought an attachment under Subsection 7 of § 4192 of the Code (new). Attachments issued and were levied.

Pending this suit, George B. Peters qualified as administrator of the estate of .Thos. Peters, and answered the bill and., amended bill herein. He had suggested the insolvency of the estate of Thos. Peters, and he set up such suggestion and insolvency as a defense among others not necessary to be noticed,

*680The Chancellor held that the levies fixed liens which were not…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manley v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  2. Richardson v. VickTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Donnell v. McCulloughTennessee Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API