Brooks v. Pan American Loan Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
DREW, Justice.
The sole question presented here is whether the lowe.r court was correct in holding that “Section 54.08, Florida Statutes, 1951, [F.S.A.] is an unwarranted and unconstitutional invasion by the Legislative branch of the Government of the Judicial branch” in disposing of the petitioner’s motion for a continuance on the ground that his attorney in the cause, George S. Okell, Sr., was a member of the 1953 Legislature. The Section referred to reads:
“54.08 Continuance of certain causes for term of legislature
“All pending litigation before the courts of this state shall stand continued…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Co. v. TetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Chicago Public Stock Exchange v. McClaughryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Bottoms v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In Re: Petition of Fla. State Bar Ass'n.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
- In Re: Petition of Fla. State Bar AssociationSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Little v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- ABC Business Forms, Inc. v. SpaetSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
- King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Little v. SullivanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964