Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Pan American Loan Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 22, 1953PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Justice.

The sole question presented here is whether the lowe.r court was correct in holding that “Section 54.08, Florida Statutes, 1951, [F.S.A.] is an unwarranted and unconstitutional invasion by the Legislative branch of the Government of the Judicial branch” in disposing of the petitioner’s motion for a continuance on the ground that his attorney in the cause, George S. Okell, Sr., was a member of the 1953 Legislature. The Section referred to reads:

“54.08 Continuance of certain causes for term of legislature
“All pending litigation before the courts of this state shall stand continued…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. St. Louis & Southeastern Railway Co. v. TetersIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Chicago Public Stock Exchange v. McClaughryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bottoms v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. In Re: Petition of Fla. State Bar Ass'n.Supreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. In Re: Petition of Fla. State Bar AssociationSupreme Court of Florida · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Little v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. ABC Business Forms, Inc. v. SpaetSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  4. Little v. SullivanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API