State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
A trial court has discretion to order a criminal defendant to be groomed before appearing in a lineup to duplicate his or her appearance at the time of the alleged criminal act. Unless the trial court is presented with irrefutable evidence that the defendant’s appearance at that time differs from eyewitness descriptions of the perpetrator of the crime, it is not an abuse of discretion to issue such an order based solely on those eyewitness descriptions. We decline to summarily restrict the trial court’s discretionary authority to issue such orders when the proper exercise of that authority is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Commonwealth v. CinelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- State v. AmmlungCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. DietrichWashington Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. McBainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Washington v. Chad Dray OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2025
- State Of Washington, V La'juanta Le'Vear ConnerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015