Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1931No. 14261Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, J.

Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction for assault with intent to murder, because Eason, the injured party, was some fifty or sixty yards away at the time appellant shot him with a shotgun loaded with squirrel shot.

Appellant had run Eason away from home the night before, threatening to get a gun and kill him. On the morning of the assault appellant first got an axe, and when Eason ran appellant seized a gun and shot him. Basquez v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 26 S.W.(2d) 206, Hatton v. State, 31 Tex. Cr. R. 686, 21 S.W. (2d)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Franklin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Basquez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
  3. Leedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API