Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Stanley
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 28, 1995No. 920, Docket 94-1337PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:
In United States v. Stanley, 12 F.3d 17 (2d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 1572, 128 L.Ed.2d 216 (1994) (“Stanley I”), a panel of this Court affirmed Philip Stanley’s conviction in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont (Billings, J.) for bank fraud, mail fraud, causing false entries in bank records, and false statements. The panel vacated his sentence, however, because the district court’s determination that Stanley caused a “loss” of $500,000 to $800,000 under U.S.S.G. § 2F1.1 (Nov. 1992) was ambiguous and not adequately…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Salvatore Cirami, Salvatore Cirami & Margaret CiramiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. James F. MooredCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. George Robert BellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Richard Harmon BellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. Ernesto Quintieri, Carlo DonatoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Luiz Ben ZviCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald E. JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. CarrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.