Thompson v. Cain
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
*435In this case we are asked to determine whether criminal defense counsel renders constitutionally ineffective assistance under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution when counsel decides to concede a defendant's guilt as to some charges in closing argument after discussing that strategy with the defendant-but in that discussion defendant neither affirmatively acquiesces nor rejects the proposed strategy, but, rather, simply maintains his innocence. We conclude that resolution of that question requires a factual inquiry into what was the defendant's fundamental objective for the *774r…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Flores, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Nichols v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020