Legal Opinion
Roman v. Broussard
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 1971No. 3657PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Judge.
Junius Lee Roman filed this suit for workmen’s compensation benefits, claiming that he is totally and permanently disabled. The defendants are John S. Broussard, and the latter’s insurer, Southern Farm Bureau *137Casualty Insurance Company. The trial court rendered judgment for defendants, and plaintiff has appealed. We affirm.
The principal issue presented is whether plaintiff has been disabled since the payment of compensation benefits was terminated. Other issues are whether plaintiff should have been allowed to choose the doctor who performed a court-ordered myelogram, and whether…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guillory v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Poche v. FrazierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Dupre v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hebert v. Sentry Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brown v. LA FRANCE IND., a DIV. OF RIEGEL TEX.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Jackson v. DC Kile, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Square v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Gauthier v. Helmerich & Payne Drilling Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Benoit v. Phillips Iron Works, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1981