Legal Opinion

W. G. Cornell Co. v. McKiever

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order denying motion for summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, pursuant to rules 113 and 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and section 476 of the Civil Practice Act, reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disburse*739ments, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The contract between the parties was in writing, and parol evidence is inadmissible to vary its terms. (Delehanty v. Dunn, 151 App. Div. 695; Gurski v. Doscher, 112 id. 345.) The pleadings and the other papers used upon the motion show that no issue was presented as to performance. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Delehanty v. DunnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kosatzky v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API