Legal Opinion

In re Wortman

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1888PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Application by Samuel W. Wortman for a mandamus to the common council of the city of Buffalo to appoint the applicant to the office of street inspector.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The applicant shows by his petition that the street commissioner of the city of Buffalo was empowered by the common council of the city to select 13 health and street inspectors of the city of Buffalo; that under the civil service rules adopted and in force in the city of Buffalo, the relator was certified to the street commissioner for one of such appointments, and his selection for that office was reported by the commissioner to the common council of the city. By section 50 of title 2 of the existing' charter of the city, the street commissioner was empowered, by and with the advice and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Hammond v. . LeonardNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Shaw v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  2. Goodrich v. MitchellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. People ex rel. Ballou v. WendellNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. LewisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1914
  5. Barthelmess v. CukorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API