Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Walter and Nancy Jacob v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 19, 1974No. 73-1346Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partRosenn, Circuit Judge

*1299I respectfully dissent as to all items which the majority deem deductible as “meals.”

Section 61(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 provides that “[ejxcept as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived. . . . ” 1

It is an established rule that exemptions from the broad definition of income in § 61 must be construed narrowly. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Jacobson, 336 U.S. 28, 49, 69 S.Ct. 358, 93 L.Ed. 477 (1949); United States v. Stewart, 311 U.S. 60, 71, 61 S.Ct. 102, 85 L.Ed. 40 (1940); Wilson v. United States, 412. F.2d 694,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Commissioner v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Hanover Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API