Legal Opinion

Welch v. Welch

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 17, 1955PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

34 N.J. Super. 197 (1955)

111 A.2d 793

MABEL V. WELCH, PLAINTIFF,

v.

HAROLD F. WELCH, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided February 17, 1955.

Mr. Jack Pincus, attorney for plaintiff.

No appearance for defendant.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.S.C.

This is an action for divorce based upon grounds of extreme cruelty. I do not find the cause of action sustained by the proofs adduced.

The parties were married in 1946 and had cohabited continuously, except for two or three brief intervals, until he left at her insistence in August 1954, under circumstances…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Singewald v. SingewaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. Zehrer v. ZehrerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. Weigel v. WeigelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  4. Yorn v. YornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1946
  5. Scullin v. ScullinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrone v. MorroneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  2. Welch v. WelchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Lowensten v. LowenstenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API