International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1DissentHolschuh, District Judge
I fully concur in the majority’s holding in Part I of its opinion that Yard-Man, in terminating the life and health insurance benefits of its retired employees at the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement, breached that agreement.
However, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding in Part II of its opinion. I believe that the judgment of the District Court ordering specific performance of Yard-Man’s contractual obligation to purchase an annuity for its retirees should be affirmed for several reasons. First, the District Court’s rejection of YardMan’s sole defense in…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.