Legal Opinion · Dissent

International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (Uaw), and Local 134, Uaw v. Yard-Man, Incorporated

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1983No. 81-1718Published

1DissentHolschuh, District Judge

I fully concur in the majority’s holding in Part I of its opinion that Yard-Man, in terminating the life and health insurance benefits of its retired employees at the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement, breached that agreement.

However, I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s holding in Part II of its opinion. I believe that the judgment of the District Court ordering specific performance of Yard-Man’s contractual obligation to purchase an annuity for its retirees should be affirmed for several reasons. First, the District Court’s rejection of YardMan’s sole defense in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API