Lee v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HARWOOD, Judge.
This appellant stands convicted of petit larceny. The appellant was not represented by counsel in the trial below, nor on this appeal. No objections were interposed during the trial below, no charges were requested, nor was there any motion for a new trial filed.
We wish to state however that the trial judge took pains to see that the legal rights of the appellant were fully protected. The record is in every way regular. The evidence presented by the State was amply sufficient to support the verdict of guilty rendered by the jury. In this aspect there is nothing presented for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Busbee v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1933
- Dotson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
- Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
3Cited by2 opinions
- Caldwell v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951
- Upton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1951