Legal Opinion
State v. Netland
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 2009No. A06-1511Published
1Opinion of the Court
762 N.W.2d 202 (2009)
STATE of Minnesota, Appellant,
v.
Jakklyn M. NETLAND, Respondent.
No. A06-1511.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
February 12, 2009.
Lori Swanson, Attorney General, St. Paul, MN; and Michael J. Colich, Tania K.M. Lex, Colich & Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.
Charles A. Ramsay, Daniel J. Koewler, Charles A. Ramsay & Assoc., PLLC, Roseville, MN, for respondent.
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Respondent Jakklyn Netland challenged her conviction for second-degree criminal test refusal, arguing that her right to due process was violated by the manner in which the breathalyzer test was…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.