Legal Opinion

Murray v. Barrett

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 2002No. A02A0959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Senior Appellate Judge.

On March 8, 1999, Philip Murray and Paul T. and Timothy N. Barrett entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement regarding a parcel of land owned by Murray in Marietta. The purchase price for the property was $220,000, and in accordance with the agreement the Barretts paid $10,000 in earnest money. The agreement provided that purchase of the property was expressly contingent upon it being appraised at a fair market value “of at least the Purchase Price.”

In May 1999, an appraisal conducted on the property indicated that the property had a value of $152,000, nearly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern Co. v. HamburgCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Craft v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  3. Karvonen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Shasta Beverages, Inc. v. Tetley USA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Homeland Communities, Inc. v. Rahall & Fryer, P. C.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bagnell v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  2. Clements v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  3. Schwartz v. BrancheauCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  4. Griffin v. BankstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API