Legal Opinion · Dissent

United Artists Corporation v. Harris

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 23, 1973No. Civ. A. CIV-73-498-DPublished

1Dissent

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge ing).

(dissent-

I dissent, both as to abstaining in the circumstances of this ease and in considering an alleged unconstitutional application of Oklahoma Obscenity Laws to Plaintiff’s film.

it is not that I do not favor the Federal abstention doctrine in the interpretation of State laws as to their constitutionality. I strongly favor this doctrine But the United States Supreme Court has clearly announced an exception to this doctrine, which this Court has recently noted and recognized in Cherokee News And Arcade, Inc. v. Field, et al., 311 F.Supp. 1194 (W.D.Okl.1970),1…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API