Legal Opinion

Collins v. Narup

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 2001No. ED 78715PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, Judge.

Tim Collins, D.C. (“Doctor”) appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of Debra Narup (“Patient”) on the ground that his cause of action for monies owed by Patient to Doctor was barred by the five-year statute of limitations set forth in section 516.120.1 We find that Doctor’s cause of action is governed by the ten-year statute of limitations set forth in section 516.110(1).2 Therefore, Doctor’s claim is not time-barred. The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

The facts relevant to the issue on appeal are essentially undisputed. Patient began receiving…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Hughes Development Co. v. Omega Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Community Title Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  4. St. Louis University v. BellevilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Hampton Foods, Inc. v. Wetterau Finance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Capital One Bank v. CreedMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API