Legal Opinion
Cardness v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 30, 1930No. 13311PublishedCited by 2 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
The possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
The criminating evidence comes from officers who acquired their information through the execution of a search warrant, the affidavit for which reads as follows:
“Before me, L. C. Link, a Justice of the Peace in and for said County, on this day personally appeared D. S. Bradford and Will Ready, who after being by me duly sworn, on their oaths depose and say: that Juan Cardness is engaged in unlawful sale of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Odell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Monroe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933