Legal Opinion

Charest v. Howard

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 6, 1972No. 1212-M. PPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.

This petition for a writ of habeas corpus is predicated on the petitioner’s contention that his incarceration in the Adult Correctional Institutions is unlawful for the reason that the order of his commitment is violative of due process.

It appears from the averment of his sworn petition that on October 17, 1969, petitioner pleaded nolo to an indictment charging him with receiving stolen goods and was sentenced to a term of five years. The execution of said sentence was suspended, however, and petitioner was placed on probation for a period of five years.

It further appears that on December 21,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Flint v. SharkeySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  4. Walker v. LangloisSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  5. O'NEILL v. SharkeySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. BourdeauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  2. Tate v. HowardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  3. State v. DeRocheSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  4. Flint v. HowardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  5. State v. BettencourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API