Legal Opinion

Florida Peninsula Insurance Co. v. Brunner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 8, 2016No. 3D15-1677PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSalter, J.

Florida Peninsula Insurance Company (FPIC) appeals a final order denying its motion for' attorney’s fees’ based on a proposal for settlement. ' Because the proposal for settlement purported to impose liability for an indeterminate category of “other claims of third parties” on the ap-pellee’s counsel, a non-party, we affirm the trial court ruling. .

The Proposal for Settlement

The proposal was made on behalf of FPIC, insürer under a homeowner’s policy in favor of Ann Brunner, under Florida Rule of' Civil Procedure 1.442 and section 768.79,’Florida Statutés (2013). The plaintiff/instíred, Ms;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. HorowitchSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. NicholsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
saritha reddy Paduru and Ravi Anugu v. Allison W. KlinkenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
Kee v. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Infinity Auto Insurance Company v. Miami Open MRI, LLC, A/A/O Rolando AmadorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025