Legal Opinion

Eastenes v. Adams

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 18, 1933No. 12,735PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bouck

The plaintiff, who is plaintiff in error here, sued in the district court to recover damages for the death of her husband from a gunshot wound alleged to have been fired by some one of twenty persons who included two of the defendants herein, Scherf and Lee, the particular one firing the shot not being known to the plaintiff.

By six consecutive amendments the initial pleading in this case underwent lmdical changes until finally it emerged as the “fourth amended complaint.” On this the plaintiff elected to stand after the court sustained demurrers interposed thereto. She now seeks to reverse…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kullgren v. Navy Gas & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Midwest Fuel & Timber Co. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API