Midkiff Implement Co. v. Worrall
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
Uniform Commercial Code.
Does “all *** farm machinery *** now owned” mean just that in a security agreement?
It does.
We affirm.
Donald Worrall, a Morgan County farmer, found himself beset by the same plight that has befallen many farmers today — he bought farm machinery which he was unable to pay for. In April of 1977, he purchased a New Holland Model 850 round hay baler from the Midkiff Implement Company. In June of the same year, he purchased a 770 W forage pickup, a New Holland Model 80 bale carrier, and a New Idea Model 404 hay rake from Midkiff. Worrall executed a retail installment…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- James Talcott, Inc. v. Franklin Nat. Bank of Mpls.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- National Cash Register Co. v. Firestone & Co. Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
- Empire MacHinery Co. v. Union Rock & Materials Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Interstate Steel Co. v. Ramm Manufacturing Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Chicago v. Michigan Beach Housing CooperativeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Provident Hospital & Training Ass'n v. GMAC Mortgage Co. (In Re Provident Hospital & Training Ass'n)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- In Re Keene Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- In Re NilesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
- In Re YoungUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.