Bohlman v. Rossi
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cowrt. — HoN. Pembrook R. Flitcraft, Judge. . The court erred in admitting incompetent and irrelevant testimony. 1 Gfreenl. Ev. [15 Ed.], sec. 52. The court erred in giving and refusing instructions. Marchilclou v. O’Hara, 52 Mo. App. 523; Hycle v. Larkin, .35 Id. 366; Stennklev.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Cowrt. — HoN. Pembrook R. Flitcraft, Judge. . The court erred in admitting incompetent and irrelevant testimony. 1 Gfreenl. Ev. [15 Ed.], sec. 52. The court erred in giving and refusing instructions. Marchilclou v. O’Hara, 52 Mo. App. 523; Hycle v. Larkin, .35 Id. 366; Stennklev. R’y, 42 Id. 74; Middleton v. R. R., 62 Mo. 579. The evidence being conflicting, this court will not interfere with the judgment of the trial court simply on the ground that it is against the weight of the evidence. Downing v. R’y, 70 Mo. App. 660. On the whole evidence the…
1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.
The plaintiffs sue the defendant on account for meat sold and delivered. During the year 1891, and up to August, 1892, and for' several years previous thereto, one Thompson had been running a butcher shop for the defendant. The defendant is engaged in the retail grocery business, and the butcher shop was run as an adjunct thereto. The arrangement between the defendant and Thompson was that the former should furnish the necessary capital and pay the hire of one man, and that Thompson should manage the business and receive one half of its. net profits as compensation for his services. From…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- Fahy v. Springfield Grocer Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Combs v. Sullivan CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Botts v. SpencerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Glueck & Co. v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Woolston v. Southern Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913