Legal Opinion

Wagner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 21, 1933No. Nos. 7081, 7082, 7097PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.

Agreed to be heard together by stipulation filed herein, these three cases are appeals from orders overruling the pleas in abatement interposed in the several causes.

The pleas in abatement set forth that the grand jury which found the indictments was not drawn in accordance with the Alaska jury law (Laws Alaska 1931, c. 100, § 2), in that only approximately 1,200 names and less than 1,250 names were in the jury box at the time of the drawing, and that the Alaskan law required that the riames of four-fifths of the voters, to wit, four-fifths of 5,291 should be in.the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Agnew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Powers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Olmstead v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Arthur King Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  2. United States v. John Bacall, United States of America v. John Bacall Imports, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  3. Mario Balestreri v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Worcester Felt Pad Corporation v. Tucson Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Yoho v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API