Legal Opinion
Robins v. Harum
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1985No. Nos. 85-3629, 85-3630PublishedCited by 124 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Mike Harum, James Harum, Joe Collins, and Chelan County appeal from the district court’s order denying their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or in the alternative, for a new trial. Appellants raise two contentions on this appeal: (1) the trial court erred in presenting to the jury appellees’ section 1983 claims based upon excessive use of force by sheriff’s deputies, and (2) the trial court erred in separately presenting to the jury *1006the torts of intentional infliction of emotional distress and assault and battery.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by124 opinions
- Chew v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Smith v. City of FontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.