Legal Opinion
Vance v. Poree
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 4, 1926No. 9415PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
WESTERFIELD, J.
This suit results from a collision between a Studebaker and a Ford automobile at the intersection of St. Charles Avenue and Robert Street. The owner of the Studebaker sues the owner of the Ford and the Ford owner reconvenes.
The trial judge dismissed plaintiff’s suit and .gave judgment for the defendant in reconvention for $100.00. Plaintiff has appealed.
Pretermitting, for the moment, the question of negligence on the part of the drivers of the colliding vehicles, we observe that the judgment appealed from must be reversed.
The owner of the Studebaker was not present at…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rusha v. W. G. Coyle Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Marullo v. St. PasteurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
3Cited by28 opinions
- McCulley v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Bethancourt v. BayhiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Paddack v. PatrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Tarleton-Gaspard v. MalocheeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Baader v. Driverless Cars, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.