Legal Opinion

Mary Catherine Willett v. The United States. Joseph William and Mary Grace Willett v. The United States. Robert E. And Anne T. Willett v. The United States. Charles D. Willett v. The United States. Paul A. And Elizabeth H. Willett v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 14, 1969No. 87-64Published

1Opinion of the Court

406 F.2d 1346

Mary Catherine WILLETT

v.

The UNITED STATES.

Joseph William and Mary Grace WILLETT

v.

The UNITED STATES.

Robert E. and Anne T. WILLETT

v.

The UNITED STATES.

Charles D. WILLETT

v.

The UNITED STATES.

Paul A. and Elizabeth H. WILLETT

v.

The UNITED STATES.

Nos. 83-64 to 87-64.

United States Court of Claims.

February 14, 1969.

Louis Lusky, New York City, for plaintiffs, James E. Fahey, Louisville, Ky., attorney of record. David W. Gray, Louisville, Ky., and Robert E. Willett, Bardstown, Ky., of counsel.

Richard J. Boyle, with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen., Mitchell Rogovin, for defendant. Philip R. Miller…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moline Properties, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Malat v. RiddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. National Investors Corporation v. HoeyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
  5. Bringwald, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API