State ex rel. Nienaber v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Upon the relation of George B. Nienaber the supreme court granted its writ of certiorari directed to the district court for Eamsey county and Honorable Charles S. Haupt, one of the judges thereof, to review the proceedings in that court under the Workmen’s Compensation Act brought by John Antil, as employee, against the City of St. P'aul and George B. Nienaber, as emjdoyers.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.
Certiorari to review a judgment in proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
*417The facts are not in dispute and are as follows:
Relator, defendant in the proceeding, was at the time in question engaged in the coal and fuel business in the city of St. Paul, and in the conduct thereof had imhis employ drivers who with teams and wagons owned by relator carted and delivered coal and other fuel to customers residing in various parts of the city. On June 9, 1917, one of relator’s wagons, loaded with coal for delivery, became so mired in the mud of one of the outlying streets that the horses…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brooks v. Central Sainte JeanneSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Gunderson v. Eastern Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by17 opinions
- Gibbs v. AlmstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Johnson v. Wisconsin Lumber & Supply Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Lundgren v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Conveyors Corp. of America v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.