Legal Opinion

In re Wilson-Nobles-Barr Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 15, 1918PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of the Wilson-Nobles-Barr Company, a corporation, bankrupt. On petition to reclaim property alleged to have been sold to bankrupts through fraudulent representations. From an order of the referee requiring return of the goods or payment therefor, the trustees petition for review.

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

The issue before the court is the right of the Wenatchee Flouring Mills, Armour & Co., and Swift & Co., to reclaim goods sold to the bankrupts, respectively through fraudulent representations it is charged. The matter was tried before the referee, who entered an order for the return of the goods to the respective claimants or payment of the value thereof. The trustees have petitioned a review.

The false statements charged were made, one to Bradstreet, February 1, 1916, and one to R. G. Dun & Co., September 17, 1916. The goods were sold by the Wenatchee Flouring Mills,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. M. W. O'rieley, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Woerderhoff Shoe Co., Inc. v. Endicott-Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. Associated Traders, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API