American Family Life Assurance of Columbus v. Ellison
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurrence
GRAVES, Presiding Justice,
Specially Concurring.
¶ 16. Today the majority reaches a conclusion that is consistent with Mississippi Code Section 11-11-3 and this Court’s pri- or interpretations of that statute. However, because the majority’s decision fails to address the relevant legal precedent, I must specially concur. Since the venue statute was amended relatively recently, there are only a few cases from this Court regarding its interpretation. Most pertinent to today’s decision are this Court’s decisions in Baptist Memorial Hospital-DeSoto, Inc. v. Bailey, 919 So.2d 1 (Miss.2005), and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Capital City Ins. v. GB" Boots" SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
- Medical Assur. Co. of Mississippi v. MyersMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
- Baptist Memorial Hospital-DeSoto, Inc. v. BaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 2005