Legal Opinion

Locher v. Gray

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1933No. 22613PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

1. Where two or more persons sign a promissory note as apparent principal makers, the note reciting that “We promise to pay,” and there is nothing to indicate that such signers are not principal makers, the note is prima facie a joint, and not a joint and several, undertaking. Graham v. Marks, 95 Ga. 38 (21 S. E. 986) ; Elrod v. Camp, 150 Ga. 48, 50 (102 S. E. 357) ; Exchange Bank of Savannah v. Harper, 35 Ga. App. 786 (134 S. E. 789). It follows that a suit on such a note can not be maintained against one of the makers alone, without accounting in a legal way for not joining the others in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMillan v. Heard National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Heard v. Tappan & MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Reid v. FlippenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Burson v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  5. Graham v. Marks & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bank of LaFayette v. GilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Benson v. HenningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Katz v. TeicherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Bank of LaFayette v. GilesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API