Legal Opinion
United States v. Voges
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 13, 1954No. Civ. A. 13927PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUCHHAUSEN, District Judge.
This is an action by Charles W. Parker against one Nathan Borock, a receiver in possession of the Voges Manufacturing Company, Inc., to compel the said receiver to enter into an arbitration.
Although various questions are raised, there is one crucial point. The question of law may be stated as follows:
“In a situation where there is a collective bargaining agreement between a company and a union with respect to all the terms of employment including the procedures for arbitration, may an individual employee in his individual capacity circumvent the union’s refusal to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bianculli v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
3Cited by19 opinions
- The Procter & Gamble Independent Union of Port Ivory, N.Y. v. The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- The Black-Clawson Company, Inc., Paper MacHine Division v. International Association of MacHinists Lodge 355, District 137, and Theodore A. BestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Falsetti v. Local Union No. 2026, United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Ostrofsky v. United Steelworkers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1959
- Jones v. International Union of Operating EngineersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.