Legal Opinion
City of Redlands v. County of San Bernardino
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 2002No. E028515, E028540PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
The County of San Bernardino (the County) approved amendments that modified its general plan relating to land use regulation of unincorporated territory located within a city’s “sphere of influence.” In connection with the approval of these amendments, the County also adopted a negative declaration under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City of Rancho Cucamonga and the City of Redlands filed petitions for writ of mandate on the ground that the County failed to comply with CEQA in adopting the amendments by preparing an environmental impact…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- County of Inyo v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Gentry v. City of MurrietaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- San Jose Christian College v. City of Morgan HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- County Sanitation District No. 2 v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Save Round Valley Alliance v. County of InyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- San Jose Christian College v. City Of Morgan HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.