Legal Opinion

People v. Comer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2016No. 152713PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) whether the defendant’s original sentence for first-degree criminal sexual conduct was rendered invalid because it did not include lifetime electronic monitoring, pursuant to MCL 750.520b(2)(d), i.e., whether MCL 750.520n requires that the defendant, who pled guilty to MCL 750.520b(l)(c), be sentenced to lifetime electronic monitoring, compare People v Brantley, 296 Mich App 546 (2012), with People v King, 297 Mich App 465 (2012); and (2) if so, whether the trial court was authorized to amend…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. People v. BrantleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People of Michigan v. Justin Timothy ComerMichigan Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API