Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Mehaffy

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

ERROR to the district court of Lancaster county. James Mehaffy and James Duffy against Joseph Lytle, who survived John Pedan. The parties agreed to consider the facts of this case in the nature of a special verdict; and they are thus stated and decided upon by the court below, (Hays, president.) In the year 1813, John Pedan (now deceased) entered with Joseph Lytle, as his surety, in a bond to Mrs Frances Evans, conditioned to pay her the sum of 24,290 dollars 62j cents.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the district court of Lancaster county. James Mehaffy and James Duffy against Joseph Lytle, who survived John Pedan. The parties agreed to consider the facts of this case in the nature of a special verdict; and they are thus stated and decided upon by the court below, (Hays, president.) In the year 1813, John Pedan (now deceased) entered with Joseph Lytle, as his surety, in a bond to Mrs Frances Evans, conditioned to pay her the sum of 24,290 dollars 62j cents. James Mehaffy, James Duffy and Henry Share were co-obligors in the same bond. A considerable portion of this debt having…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Kennedy, J.

The various positions affirmed and laid down by ¡the court below, which have been excepted to in this case, are all, •as we conceive, perfectly correct and tenable; most of them are so plain to the legal mind as to be self-evident, and therefore require no argument to be made or reasons to be adduced in order to establish or make them more so. What, however, is said in regard 'to the statute of limitations and some other matters, not being a ■bar, or interposing an obstacle to the recovery of the plaintiff, seem from their nature and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simmons v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. King v. BlackmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. New Zealand Insurance v. MaazColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. New Zealand Insurance v. MaazColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Walbridge's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API