Legal Opinion

Zack v. Saxonburg Borough

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1956No. Appeals, 110 and 111PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bx

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

We have before us interpretation of the Act of July 1, 1937, P. L. 2547, 53 PS 2774, which provides: “Hereafter any person, copartnership, association or corporation claiming damages from any county, city, borough, town, township, school district or other municipality, arising from the negligence of such municipality or any employe thereof, shall, within six (6) months from the date of origin of such claim or within six (6) months from the date of the negligence complained of, file in the office of the clerk or secretary of such municipality a notice in writing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lutz v. ScrantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Badger v. Upper Darby TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Matthews v. Plum Twp. School Dist.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. McBride v. Rome TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. O'Hara v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. CROSS ET UX v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Yurechko v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Heck v. City of KnoxvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
  4. Landis v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Dubin v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API