Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Granados v. Windson Development Corp.

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided January 28, 1997No. Record No. 0892-96-4Published

1ConcurrenceAnnunziata, Judge

I concur in the majority’s decision affirming the commission’s denial of benefits to this claimant. Claimant, partially disabled as a result of an employment accident, is not entitled to benefits under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act) because, as an undocumented alien, he cannot legally market his remaining work capacity. See Manis Constr. Co. v. Arellano, 13 Va.App. 292, 294, 411 S.E.2d 233, 235 (1991).

I write separately, however, because I disagree with the majority opinion to the extent it holds that claimant’s misrepresentation as to his eligibility for employment is a bar…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Burlington Mills Corp. v. HagoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941
  2. Nolde Bros. v. ChalkleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  3. Humphrees v. Boxley Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  4. McDaniel v. Colonial Mechanical Corp.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1986
  5. Fernandez-Lopez v. Jose Cervino, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API