Legal Opinion
People v. Holman
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. The record establishes that, in considering defendant’s Sandoval motion, the Trial Judge balanced the probative worth of the evidence against the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant in accordance with People v Sandoval (34 NY2d 371).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Yesawich, Jr. * Taking no part: Judge Simons.
*
Designated pursuant to NY Constitution, article VI, § 2.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by5 opinions
- Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Marini v. AdamoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- People v. WigginsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. ChandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. CabassaNew York Supreme Court · 2000