Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Knapp

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided July 1, 1885PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The complainants’ motion is, in substance, one to remove a demurrer from the files. The defendants demurred to the hill for want of equity, and the demurrer, waa set down for argument, and was overruled. The defendants then answered, and at the same time demurred again to the whole bill. A defendant cannot at the same time answer and demur to the whole bill, though he may demur to part and answer to the residue. Equity rule 32. After a demurrer has been overruled, a defendant may insist upon the same matters by way of defense in his answer. This has not been attempted here. The defendants…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. ByamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1840

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
  2. Keenan v. Texas Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
  3. Brown v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
  4. Gasoline Products Co. v. American Refining Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API