Legal Opinion

Good v. U S Dept of Housing and Urban Development

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided December 12, 2019No. 3:18-cv-00516Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION TIMOTHY A. GOOD, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:18-CV-516 DRL-MGG UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Mr. Timothy Good, a pro se litigant, challenges the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) implementation of a no-smoking policy in HUD-funded public housing. On July 8, 2019, Mr. Good filed a summary judgment motion. Two days later, he sent a letter to the former presiding judge seeking to suspend HUD’s no-smoking policy until its legality…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API