Legal Opinion

United States v. Gilberto Baldenegro-Valdez

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2013No. 11-3183, 11-3581PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Gilberto Baldenegro-Valdez and Juan Rodriguez-Guerra (also known as Felipe Camarena) (collectively, “defendants”) appeal their convictions, for conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, following their joint jury trial. They assert several pretrial and trial errors. We affirm the district court. 1

I. BACKGROUND

In March 2010, Franklin España, a suspect in a different methamphetamine conspiracy investigation than the one at issue here, spoke with FBI agents, offering information about a methamphetamine supplier in Kansas City, Camarena. España began helping the government and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Colorado v. BertineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodney AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  2. John Hugh Gilmore v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Dion ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. Shelton OliverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Kenneth BordersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API