Ludington v. Bell
The Superior Court of New York City
Appeal from order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to discontinue action without costs.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.—Freedman, J.
As a general rui- . when a defendant, pending the action, obtains an u *514solvent’s discharge, or a discharge in bankruptcy, the court, in the exercise of its discretionary power, will permit the plaintiff to discontinue- without costs (Hart v. Story, 1 Johns. 143; Merchants’ Bank v. Moore, 2 Id. 294; Case v. Belknap, 5 Cow. 422; Labron v. Woram, 5 Hill, 373).
But where the plaintiff, knowing of the defendant’s discharge, nevertheless goes on with the suit, he will be required, if he afterwards discontinue, to pay the costs to which the defendant was subjected after the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Honeywell v. BurnsNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Ludlow v. HackettNew York Supreme Court · 1820
- Merritt v. ArdenNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- St. John v. HartNew York Supreme Court · 1858
- Case v. BelknapNew York Supreme Court · 1826